Your pages are fighting each other in Google
When two pages target the same search, Google splits your ranking between them and neither wins. This finds every case on your site, tells you which page to keep, and hands you the exact edits and redirects to fix it.
What competing pages quietly cost you
It is the rankings problem you cannot see in your analytics, because both pages look fine on their own. The damage is that they exist at all.
Your authority gets split
Two pages on one topic divide the links and relevance that should have stacked into a single, stronger page.
Google picks, and often wrong
When it cannot tell which page you meant to rank, it chooses one, sometimes the weaker one, and shuffles between them.
You outrank yourself, downward
Both pages sit lower than one consolidated page would, so you lose the position to a competitor who only wrote it once.
One address in, a decision out
Paste your address
One URL. No sign-up to try it, no tracking code, nothing installed.
It reads your whole site
Every page compared against every other, in about twenty seconds.
You get a fix list
Ranked by priority: keep this one, trim that, redirect these, in order.
You get a plan you can act on today
Other tools stop at the finding and leave the hard part, which page to keep, to you. This one makes the call, shows its evidence, and writes out the fix.
The page to keep, and why
One winner per group, with the evidence it was chosen on: your own links, the depth, the title.
The exact sections to cut
Named heading by heading on each losing page, not a vague “trim the overlap”.
Copy-paste 301 redirects
For Apache, Nginx, Next.js, Netlify or any CMS. The fix, not homework about the fix.
The internal links to repoint
Which pages link to the one you are merging away, so nothing points at a dead page.
A priority order and a work list
Highest impact first, with a box to tick as you go. You always know what to do next.
Export and re-scan
CSV, Markdown, PDF or JSON. Come back after the fix and see exactly what it resolved.
A real plan, from a real site
This is what it returned for this site. Not a mock-up: the numbers below came out of the same scan you just ran, or are about to.
This one keeps the topic
How much does a website cost
/guides/how-much-does-a-website-cost
Its title is the only one that carries the question, and your own site links to it 4 times from body copy against 1, and it carries 40 concrete figures against 18.
Hire in-house or work with a studio
/guides/hire-vs-studio · 1 link in · 18 figures
Cut these sections
- The real cost of working with a studio
- The hidden costs of hiring
Web app or mobile app
/guides/web-app-vs-mobile-app · 0 links in · 4 figures
Cut these sections
- The hidden cost of mobile
Straight talk before you spend a thing
You audit sites for a living, so here is the ceiling in plain terms. It is a short list on purpose.
It will not guess
When nothing separates two pages, it says it cannot call it rather than inventing a winner. A tool that guesses is worse than no tool.
It reads HTML, not JavaScript
If your text is drawn by JavaScript, it says so plainly instead of reporting a clean site it never actually read.
It reads up to a limit
Your sitemap, or your homepage links when there is none, up to 100 pages a scan. A larger site is read in part, and it says so.
It is not a rank tracker
It compares your pages against each other, not against Google. No Search Console and no third-party data to connect.
It defaults to trimming
It only says merge when two pages really are the same page written twice, because redirecting a page that earns traffic is worse than nothing.
It keeps the plan, not your pages
Your content is read, compared, and thrown away. Only the plan is stored, and only for you.
Run it on your own site first
Run it on your own site right now. If the plan is not worth acting on, you are out twenty seconds. Every Growth Tool is included in one subscription: start a free trial and scan any site.
Scan your site